What is the onset mechanism of internal hernia after vertebral body fracture? A case of internal hernia secondary to traumatic vertebral fracture
- 1 Department of Surgery, Hanyu General Hospital, Hanyu, Japan
- 2 Department of Orthopedics, Hanyu General Hospital, Hanyu, Japan
- 3 Department of Pathology, Hanyu General Hospital, Hanyu, Japan
- Correspondence to Dr Akiyo Matsumoto; ak-matsumoto@mti.biglobe.ne.jp
Abstract
A 67-year-old man who had been pinned between a basket crane and a tree complained of severe pain in his lower back and a decreased appetite. Laparotomy after decompressing the gastrointestinal tract revealed incarceration of an ileal loop within a fractured third lumbar vertebra. The damaged bowel was resected, and an end-to-end anastomosis was performed. Once the patient’s condition had stabilised, posterior lumbar fixation was performed. There were no abdominal complications or lower limb neurological deficits during the follow-up period. Enhanced CT and MRI had been helpful in making the diagnoses. Histopathological examination revealed the aetiology of the traumatic incarceration: the intestine had been pinched as the disc space closed, and the body attempted to return to its original state by exerting countertraction.
Background
Mechanical intestinal obstruction caused by entrapment of the small intestine within the space of fractured or dislocated vertebral bodies is exceedingly rare. Traumatic incarceration of the small bowel accompanied by vertebral fractures and dislocation is often not diagnosed until the time of laparotomy. Intravenous contrast-enhanced CT and MRI are helpful for the diagnosis of incarcerated small bowel. However, the mechanism responsible for traumatic incarceration of the small bowel is not yet known. The histopathological specimen obtained in the presently reported case may suggest the mechanism responsible for the incarceration.
Written informed consent for participation was obtained from the patient.
Case presentation
On 21 April 2020, a 67-year-old man was pinned between a basket crane and a tree while trimming trees, and he subsequently experienced severe chest and lower back pain and a decreased appetite. When his symptoms failed to improve the following day, he was transferred to another hospital by ambulance. Additional examination resulted in a diagnosis of a traumatic rib fracture and incarceration of the small bowel associated with fracture and dislocation of the third lumbar vertebra (L3) (figure 1C), and the patient was transferred and urgently admitted to our hospital. Scratches were observed on the right side of the patient’s trunk on admission (figure 2A). The rib fracture was treated conservatively. The patient’s abdominal symptoms were stable on admission, and a CT examination did not show a closed loop sign. However, the patient started to experience bile-stained vomiting and abdominal distention. We decided it would be advantageous to prioritise gastrointestinal (GI) decompression before surgery considering that a surgery would be much easier and safer. GI decompression was achieved by inserting an ileus tube because of the increased bile-stained vomiting and the aggravation of the abdominal distention. The patient underwent a laparotomy after performing GI decompression on the fifth day after his injury. After his condition had stabilised, posterior lumbar fixation was performed 2 weeks after the laparotomy. There were no abdominal complications or lower limb neurological deficits during the follow-up period.
Intravenous contrast-enhanced CT scans of a 67-year-old male patient who had sustained an L3 fracture revealed that the enhanced intestinal wall was in an unusual location, behind the abdominal aorta and the inferior vena cava. (A) U-shaped loop incarcerated bowel behind the inferior vena cava and abdominal aorta. (B) Gastro contrast image from the ileus tube showed a migrated image (the caliber change) of the small intestinal tract in the position of L3 (indicated arrows). (C) Ileum incarcerated in the potential space in the L3 vertebra behind the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava (indicated arrow). (D) Sagittal CT demonstrating L3 fracture-dislocation (indicated arrow). (E) Sagittal T2 MRI showing disruption of the anterior longitudinal ligament and fracture-dislocation of L3 vertebra (indicated arrow).
(A) Scratches of the body surface were observed on the right side of the body at the time of visit (indicated black arrows). (B) Intraoperative photo demonstrating the small bowel prolapsed into the ventral lumbar space. (C) Ventral vertebral body defect after the entrapped bowel was released. (D) A segment of necrotic and perforated small bowel released from vertebral entrapment. (E(a)) Macroscopic findings of the migrated intestinal tract on the serosal surface showed the adipose tissue in retroperitoneal space (indicated red rod line). (E(b)) Histopathological findings of the migrated intestinal tract on the serosal surface showed the adipose tissue in retroperitoneal space (indicated thick black arrow). Histopathological findings of the migrated intestinal tract showed the fusion line between the intestinal serosa and the parietal peritoneum (indicated thin black arrows).
Investigations
The patient’s leucocyte count and C reactive protein level increased to 13.57×109/L, respectively, and his creatine phosphokinase level rose to 828 U/L at the time of admission.
An MRI examination revealed an L3 fracture-dislocation (figure 1E). Abdominal CT showed a severe intestinal obstruction in the space surrounded by the abdominal aorta, inferior vena cava and L3 vertebra, associated with an L3 fracture-dislocation, but no closed loop sign was observed in the intestine (figure 1A,D). A GI contrast image obtained via the ileus tube showed an intestinal migrated image (calibre change) in the small intestine at the L3 level (figure 1B). Macroscopic examination of the serosal surface of the incarcerated intestinal tract indicated adipose tissue in the damaged retroperitoneal space. The red dotted line in figure 2E indicated the area where the intestine was resected and extracted from the damaged retroperitoneal space, and the thick black arrow showed the surgical resection line in histopathological image. Histopathological examination of the serosal surface of the incarcerated intestinal tract also indicated a fusion line (showed by the thin black arrows) between the intestinal serosa and the parietal peritoneum attached with adipose tissue in the disc space. The serosa and parietal peritoneum were recognised as a single line of adhesion as a result of inflammation (figure 2E).
Differential diagnosis
Initially, the patient had no tenderness in the abdomen, and a neurological examination revealed no sensory deficit or muscle weakness. Abdominal pain can be misdiagnosed or overlooked in patients with acute spinal trauma. Paralytic ileus resulting from spinal injuries or retroperitoneal haematomas are more frequently diagnosed than small bowel incarceration since the symptoms mimic ileus. We evaluated CT scanning and MRI examinations in our diagnosis. After further examination, the patient was diagnosed with incarceration of the small bowel accompanied by a fracture and dislocation of the L3 vertebra (figure 1C).
Treatment
The rib fracture was treated conservatively. GI decompression was performed by inserting an ileus tube because of an increase in bile-stained vomiting and aggravation of abdominal distention. On day 5 after the injury, laparotomy was performed after decompressing the GI tract. An ileal loop incarcerated within L3 was observed (figure 2B). A distended intestinal segment 180 cm distal to the ileocecal valve was seen disappearing behind the abdominal aorta through a 4×5 cm hole in the retroperitoneum at the L3 level together with a rupture of the anterior longitudinal ligament (figure 2C). The damaged, perforated bowel segment was resected (figure 2D), and an end-to-end anastomosis was performed.
The initial CT scan did not show a closed loop sign. This is a weak point of CT imaging. It was thought that repeated CT examinations should be required when the diagnosis was uncertain. After the patient’s condition had stabilised, posterior lumbar fixation was performed 2 weeks after the laparotomy.
Outcome and follow-up
Seven months after the abdominal and orthopaedic surgery, the patient is now back at work and doing well. The patient had no abdominal complications or lower limb nerve function deficiency during the follow-up period.
Discussion
Small bowel obstruction secondary to a dislocation or fracture of the lumbar spine has been described previously but is an extremely rare complication. We reviewed 13 previous cases of small bowel incarceration diagnosed with dislocation or fracture of the lumbar spine since 1979 (table 1).1–13
Fracture and dislocation of lumbar vertebrae with entrapment of the bowel: Case reports and literature review.
Age | Sex | Injury mechanism | Preoperative duration | Spinal segment | Damaged bowel | Postoperative complications | Outcome |
3 years | Male | Car accident | 5 days | L2-L3 | Jejunum | None | No clinical symptoms |
8 years | Male | Road accident | 9 days | L1, L2 | Small bowel | None | No clinical symptoms |
4 years | Male | Ejected from a pick-up truk | 2 days | L2, L3 | Jejunum | None | No clinical symptoms |
22 years | Male | Car accident | 3 days | L1, L2 | Jejunum | Wound infection | A motor paresis in the L1-L4 region |
3 weeks | Male | Car accident | Immediate surgery | L1, L2 | Jejunum | None | No clinical symptoms |
1.4 years | Male | Car accident | 13 days | L2 | Jejunum | None | No clinical symptoms |
37 years | Male | Motorcycle accident | Immediate surgery | L4, L5 | Jejunum | Pneumonia, femoral vein thrombosis | Numbness in the left lower extremity |
18 years | Male | Car accident | Immediate surgery | L5, S1 | Ileum | Pulmonary embolism | Paralysed |
64 years | Male | Waist hit | 6 days | L3, L4 | Jejunum | Candida albicans infection, cortical infarction | No clinical symptoms |
44 years | Male | Fell down from a 3 m height | 2 days | L4, L5 | Jejunum | Retroperitoneal abscess | Slight lesion of the plexus |
82 years | Male | Degeneration | 4 days | L5, S1 | Sigmoid colon | None | No clinical symptoms |
7 years | Male | Car accident | Immediate surgery | L3, L4 | Jejunum | Cerebrospinal fluid leak | No neurological recovery |
43 years | Male | Train accident | 7 days | L4 | Jejunum | None | No clinical symptoms |
This condition is usually not diagnosed until laparotomy, because the symptoms of intestinal obstruction are not always progressive in the early stage, and thus it takes time to diagnose intestinal obstruction that requires emergency surgery.
When the patient was first admitted to our hospital, his abdominal symptoms were stable, and a CT examination did not show a closed loop sign. We thought it would be advantageous to prioritise GI decompression considering that a surgery would be much easier and safer.
Min et al reported that potential areas in the lumbar spine through which the small intestine can herniate are a result of a severe hyperextension injury or from vertebral body fractures.14 Two theories have been proposed to explain incarceration of the small bowel within the lumbar spine: an anterior force might push the bowel posteriorly, or the potential space might create a vacuum effect that entraps the bowel.8 14 Any intraperitoneal or retroperitoneal contents could theoretically become incarcerated in such spinal defects. Defects in the anterior longitudinal ligament and the vertebral column can develop as a result of infection or trauma. Kim et al reported a case of osteodiscitis resulting in trauma to the intervertebral disc and anterior longitudinal ligament leading to invagination of the inferior vena cava.15 The jejunum is the most commonly reported structure to become entrapped, typically as a result of acute trauma.1–7 9 12 16 There have also been reports of entrapment of the ileum and sigmoid colon,8 11 and other structures, including common iliac vessels,17 the inferior vena cava,15 18 retroperitoneal fat and the psoas muscle, have also been observed to herniate into a widened ventral space.15
Incarceration of the small bowel should be a consideration in patients with trauma to the vertebral body or longitudinal ligament resulting from severe injury to the lumbar spine.14 CT and MRI examinations are useful as means of making an early diagnosis of intestinal incarceration associated with spinal trauma. However, CT scans do not always provide visual evidence of bowel incarceration. Davis et al described a scenario of entrapment of the small bowel in which CT results only showed retroperitoneal free air and a thickened bowel at L2, with no additional confirmation of incarceration of the bowel.9
A histopathological examination explained the mechanism of the traumatic incarceration in our patient. An unnaturally strong adipose tissue adhesion was observed on the serosal surface of the small intestine in the histopathological specimen, and fusion between the small intestinal serosa and parietal peritoneum attached with the adipose tissue of the peritoneal cavity was also observed. Scratches were observed on the right side of the patient’s trunk on admission (figure 2A). The patient’s body had been pinched by force from both the front and back. The external force to the front of the abdomen had pushed the small intestine into the back. The force from the back had caused a large amount of damage to the anterior longitudinal ligament and the vertebral column that resulted in the opening of a disc space, and the extruded intestine entered the space. The intestine appeared to have subsequently been actively pinched when the disk space closed as the patient’s body attempted to return to its original state by exerting countertraction.
This situation could lead to intestinal necrosis and sepsis, and possibly death. An exploratory laparotomy with direct visualisation is often needed to render a diagnosis as quickly as possible. Surgical treatment of spinal fracture-dislocation increases the risk of bowel entrapment caused by vacuum phenomena from increased vertebral spaces from lumbar lordosis.14 The spinal fracture dislocation should be stabilised after a laparotomy.
Patient’s perspective
At the time of the trauma, my stomach and back were very painful and bad. One month after the operation, I had occasional constipation and diarrhoea, and my stomach was unstable. I had abdominal and spine surgeries, and I was very worried about the future. After that, my stomach and back were in very good condition. I am very pleased because there is no postoperative ileus and no nerve damage. I am very grateful that I have returned to work now.
Learning points
-
Patients with traumatic spinal injury with trauma to the anterior longitudinal ligament or vertebral body should also be evaluated for potential incarceration of the small bowel. This condition is usually not diagnosed until laparotomy.
-
CT and MRI examinations are useful as means of making an early diagnosis of intestinal incarceration associated with spinal trauma. However, CT scans do not always provide visual evidence of bowel incarceration.
-
A histopathological examination explained the onset mechanism of the traumatic incarceration in our patient. The intestinal tract was actively pinched as the disc space closed and the body attempted to return to its original state through countertraction.
-
An exploratory laparotomy and direct visualisation should be performed as soon as possible, preferably before necrosis and sepsis arising from the incarcerated intestine.
-
Fixation of the spinal fracture and dislocation should be achieved after laparotomy to reduce complications of bowel entrapment caused by vacuum phenomena in increased vertebral spaces from lumbar lordosis.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Ethics approval
This study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Hanyu General Hospital.
Acknowledgments
We would like to take this opportunity to thank Dr Naoki Kobayashi (the orthopedic surgeon in our hospital) for his involvement in vertebral surgery after abdominal surgery.
Footnotes
-
Contributors Conception and design: AM. Collection and assembly of data: AM, TA, and NK. Data analysis and interpretation: AM, TA, HM, MK and NK. Manuscript writing: AM. Final approval of manuscript: AM, TA, HM, MK and NK.
-
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
References
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer